Disposed

Champion Ceramics Private Limited, Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh, Thr. Director Niket Agrawal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, New Delhi through the Chairman Cum Managing Director and Others

Bombay HC10 Mar 2022CAW/514/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Nagpur Bench dismissed an amendment application in a writ petition challenging an e-tender by BHEL. The Court held that adding new parties and the rejection of the bid constituted a new cause of action. The petition and civil application were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application and Writ Petition disposed of; amendment to add new parties denied.

Champion Ceramics Private Limited, Janjgir… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 / 3 12-WP-3195-2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 514 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3195 OF 2021

¶4

Champion Ceramics Private Limited -- Petitioner/s Vs.

¶5

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited & Ors. -- Respondent/s

¶6

Mr. C.B. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the Applicant/ Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S.G. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶7

Mr. A.S. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.6.

¶8

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

¶9

DATE : 10 MARCH 2022

¶10

P. C. :

¶11

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶12

By this Civil Application, the Petitioner has sought to amend the Writ Petition to add the parties and subsequent events. The Civil Application is opposed by the Respondents by filing reply.

¶13

The Petitioner had filed this petition to challenge the pre-qualification criteria in e-tender No. 2101091 dated 4 August 2021, which was invited by the Respondent – Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, and to permit the Petitioner to participate in

¶14

SUMIT

¶15

2 / 3 12-WP-3195-2021

¶16

the tender. By the interim order dated 31 August 2021, while issuing notice, the Petitioner was allowed to participate in the bid, and if the Petitioner was found to be eligible, award to be issued to the Petitioner subject to approval. Thereafter, on 25 October 2021, further order was passed and it was directed that if any work order is issued, it will be subject to the result of the petition.

¶17

The Petitioner participated in the tender, however, was not granted the tender. The tender is now been issued to three parties. The Petitioner, with this Civil Application, has sought to join them and also the National Thermal Power Corporation as party Respondents.

¶18

Learned Counsel for the Respondents, while opposing the Civil Application, contended that the petition was filed praying to permit the Petitioner to participate in the tender, which was done and the petition is worked out and what is sought to be introduced by an amendment is a new cause of action. It was further contended that the pendency of the Writ Petition is causing substantial impact on the work, which is of sensitive nature being insulation for chimneys of Thermal Power Plants, and in view of the interim observations, it is difficult to proceed further with the actual work.

¶19

Having considered these facts, we are of the view that allowing the Civil Application for amendment is not a proper

¶20

SUMIT

¶21

3 / 3 12-WP-3195-2021

¶22

course of action. What is put forth by the Petitioner is a new cause of action. The rejection of the Petitioner’s bid and award to the others is a cause of action which is different than the stage at which the petition was filed when the Petitioner was not allowed to participate in the tender. We also have to take note of the concern expressed by the Respondent in the larger public interest and the financial implications of the pendency of the petition. It is open to the Petitioner to institute substantive proceedings if so advised.

¶23

The Writ Petition also will not survive. The Civil Application and the Writ Petition are disposed of with above observations.

¶24

Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:16.03.2022 18:59

¶25

SUMIT

Champion Ceramics Private Limited, Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh, Thr. Director Niket Agrawal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, New Delhi through the Chairman Cum Managing Director and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Champion Ceramics Private Limited, Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh, Thr. Director Niket Agrawal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, New Delhi through the Chairman Cum Managing Director and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaymala Krishna Asankar and Another Vs State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secy., Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Muhammad Iftekhar Abdul Salam Vs Maharashtra State Council of Examination, through Its Commissioner and 3 Others

M/S. Universe Real Infra Thr. Its Proprietor Shri. Pravin Totalwar and Another Vs Union of India,Thr. Secretary Ministry of Finance, New Delhi

Raju Wasudeo Hiwale and 8 Ors. Vs State of Mah. Thru. Secty. and Anor.

Sau. Chandrakala W/O Pundalikrao Thakre Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary and 3 Others

Champion Ceramics Private Limited, Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh, Thr. Director Niket Agrawal Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, New Delhi through the Chairman Cum Managing Director and Others