This order allowed a civil application seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default. The Court held the petition liable to be restored and directed compliance with office objections.
Civil application allowed; writ petition restored; time granted for removal of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed URMILA by URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2022.07.08 18:55:19 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1203 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3999 OF 2022
Mr. Murlidhar Janardhan Gharat
… Applicant
vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
Mr. Indrajeet R. Kulkarni, for Applicant. Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for State.
CORAM : A. K. MENON , J. &
M.S. KARNIK , J.
DATED : 8th JULY, 2022
P.C. :
liable to be restored. Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer
clauses (a) & (b).
Service of finally numbered petition shall be effected forthwith. Reply to be
1/2
filed within 4 weeks.
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition dismissed in default due to non-removal of office objections can be restored.
Whether the delay in removal of objections justifies restoration of the petition.
Mr. Murlidhar Janardhan Gharat
State of Maharashtra
A. K. MENON
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
