Dismissed

Union of India Defence Estate Officer, Bombay Circle, Bombay v. Smt. Shalin Raje Bhosle (Deceased) through Lrs. Sargram Singh Rajaramsingh Bhosle and Others

Bombay HC10 Aug 2022CAO/284/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application filed by Union of India seeking condonation of delay. Court condoned delay but found no error apparent on record or merit in grounds, dismissing the application.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned for consideration on merits, but review application dismissed for lack of merit. Leave granted to amend prayer clause.

Union of India Defence Estate Officer, Bombay… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 / 3 CAO-284.2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 284 OF 2019

¶4

IN

¶5

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) (STAMP) NO. 23671 OF 2018
Union of India

¶6

vs.

¶7

Smt. Shalini Raje Bhosle and others

¶8

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Mr. Saurabh A. Chaudhari, Advocate for applicant.

¶10

CORAM : MANISH PITALE J.
DATE : 10/08/2022

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 284 OF 2019

¶12

This is an application seeking
condonation of delay in filing the accompanying
review application. The reasons for delay have been
stated in paragraphs 6 to 9. It is thereafter stated
that the applicant has a strong case on merits in the
review application.

¶13

2. Although the reasons stated in the above
paragraphs in terms of the law laid down by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court, cannot be taken to be
demonstrating sufficient cause for condonation of

¶14

KOLHE

¶15

2 / 3 CAO-284.2019

¶16

delay, but this Court is of the opinion that in the facts
and circumstances of the present case, it would be
appropriate to condone delay, so that review
application can be considered on merits.

¶17

3.Accordingly, the application is allowed and
delay is condoned.

¶18

M.C.A. (REVIEW) NO. OF 2018

¶19

The learned counsel for the review
applicant seeks leave to correct an inadvertent
mistake made in the prayer clause. Leave granted.
Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶20

2.This Court has heard Mr.S.A.Chaudhari,
learned counsel for the applicant at length.

¶21

3.A perusal of the grounds for review stated
in the application and the nature of contentions
raised on behalf of the applicant demonstrates that
the contentions sought to be raised are more in the
nature of re-arguing the appeal that was disposed of
by this Court along with the cross objection on
28/02/2018. This Court is unable to appreciate any
error apparent on the face of record in order to
exercise review jurisdiction.

¶22

KOLHE

¶23

3 / 3 CAO-284.2019

¶24

4.In view of the above, it is found that there
is no merit in the present review application.
Accordingly, it is dismissed.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Digitally signed byRAVIKANT CHANDRAKANT KOLHE Signing Date:10.08.2022 16:59

¶27

KOLHE

Union of India Defence Estate Officer, Bombay Circle, Bombay v. Smt. Shalin Raje Bhosle (Deceased) through Lrs. Sargram Singh Rajaramsingh Bhosle and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India Defence Estate Officer, Bombay Circle, Bombay v. Smt. Shalin Raje Bhosle (Deceased) through Lrs. Sargram Singh Rajaramsingh Bhosle and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Shivnath Puri vs Sushma Ramnarayan Khanna and 2 Ors.

Shri Sharad Sitaramji Shende and Others Vs Shri Nilesh Subhashandji Katariya and Others

Sau. Madhuri W/O Ramesh Etankar (Ku. Madhuri Prabhakar Shende) and Another Vs Shri Nilesh Subhashandji Katariya and Others

Narayan Pandhari Narkhede and Others Vs Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and 4 Others

M/S Monarch Mdicals, through Its Managing Partner, Shri Santosh Rathi, Nagpur and Another Vs Shri Padmanabh S/O Vinayak Buty and Another

The Chairman and Managing Director, Bank of Maharashtra, Pune and Others Vs Kishore S/O Shankarrao Khadatkar and Others