Bhaskar Sakharam Thakur Vs Raisuddin Khan Haji Usman Khan and Anr.

It is pointed out that the right arm of the applicant is amputed from elbow. He further submitted that only after deposit of amount of compensation and withdrawal thereof, he could arrange the money for preferring this appeal. This contention of applicant is not opposed by respondents. This Court, therefore, has no reason to disbelieve the same. There appears no intentional delay on the part

¶15

ca1949.19.odt

¶16

2 -

¶17

of the applicant in preferring the appeal. Even otherwise, he would

¶18

not be gaining anything out of that. Hence the order :

¶19

ORDER

¶20

i) Application stands allowed.

¶21

ii) Delay of 342 days caused in preferring appeal stands condoned.

¶22

iii) Appeal be registered.

¶23

iv) Applicant is not entitled to receive any amount of interest on enhanced compensation upto the date of filing of appeal, if he succeeds in the appeal.

¶24

v) Civil application stands disposed of.

¶25

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge

¶26

dyb

Bhaskar Sakharam Thakur v. Raisuddin Khan Haji Usman Khan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhaskar Sakharam Thakur v. Raisuddin Khan Haji Usman Khan and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd., vs Bhushan Suresh Sonar and Anr.

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai vs Swati Sudesh Kadam and Ors.

C. Antony Louis vs the Hema Park Coop. Housing Society

Tirupati Computer Stationers Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad and Anr. Vs Ashok Chandrabhan Salunke and Ors.

Bharatbai Balaji Zokdare and Ors. Vs Kazi Abdul Wahid Saifuddin and Anr.

Dnyandeo Rangnath Mali and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.