High Court rejected the review petition as it consciously decided not to grant interest on the enhanced non-pecuniary compensation amount. Petitioners were directed to seek remedy via appeal.
Review application rejected. Applicants directed to avail remedy in appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA.14703.2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14703 OF 2022
IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1382 OF 2017
..Applicants
Vs.
..Respondents
Mr.R.L.Kute, Advocate for appellants
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 02, 2022
ORDER :-
This Court has consciously not granted component of interest on the enhanced amount of compensation granted on account of non-pecuniary damages. The Court is, therefore, not inclined to entertain the review application. The applicants may have remedy in appeal.
[ R.G. AVACHAT, J. ]
KBP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review application can be entertained regarding the component of interest on enhanced non-pecuniary damages.
Suman w/o. Dashrath Varpe
Jayashri d/o. Dashrath Varpe
Rupali d/o. Dashrath Varpe
Gopinath s/o. Pandharinath Varpe
The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.
Vikram s/o. Lahu Gavhane
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
