Allowed
Rukhaminbai Gitaram Vagharal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCA/1325/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca1325.20
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1325 OF 2020 IN FAST/488/2020
RUKHAMINBAI GITARAM VAGHARAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rakhunde Pravin B AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. A.B. Chate
CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J. DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2022
PER COURT :-
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1 and 2. None present for respondent No.3 inspite of service. In other connected matters arising out of same acquisition proceeding this Court has condoned the delay. Hence, I pass the following order:-
O R D E R
(S. G. DIGE, J.)
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to civil application relief despite service deficiencies of third respondent.
RUKHAMINBAI GITARAM VAGHARAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court