Bail application dismissed on the last hearing date for want of prosecution as the applicant lacked representation. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(18)BA-725-2021.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.725 OF 2021
Prakash Ananta Jadhav ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2022.
P.C.
1] On the last date of hearing i.e. on 20.07.2022 none represented the applicant. Today also no one is present to represent him.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Prakash Ananta Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
