The High Court granted leave to the applicant to withdraw the bail application (708 of 2022). The application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court stated it did not decide the merits.
Leave to withdraw the bail application was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42 ba 708-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 708 OF 2022
Santosh Hanumanta Ullali @ Chini Mama
..Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondent/s
Ms. Kanchan Jha i/b. Sanjay Singh for the Applicant . Ms. Sharmila Kaushik, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 1st APRIL, 2022.
P.C.
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that chargesheet has been filed, and the Applicant desires to file fresh application before the Sessions Court. Hence, under instructions, he seeks leave to withdraw the Application.
2. Leave granted. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the
matter. In the event, an Application for bail is filed before the Sessions Court, the same shall be decided on its own merits.
Digitally signed by PRASANNA P PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR Date: 2022.04.05 11:17:05 +0530
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Salgaonkar
1 of 1
Santosh Hanumanta Ullali
The State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
