The single judge dismissed the bail application without indulgence regarding the applicant's non-attendance in the trial court, citing lack of clarity in the stated reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 41 BA 65.22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.625 OF 2022
Senual Kudash Shaikh .. Applicant
Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Tabish Mooman a/w Ms. Aditi Katnekar for the Applicant. Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 19th AUGUST, 2022
P.C:-
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish Mhaske
Senual Kudash Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
