The High Court disposed of a bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicants were unrepresented on the last date of hearing.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 21 BA-608-21.doc
Digitally signed by SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR M M M M Date: 2022.08.23 01:02:26 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.608 OF 2021
Narayan Nago Pardhi & Anr.
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the Applicants.
Ms.P.N. Dabholkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. API S.D.Darade, present.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 22nd AUGUST, 2022
P.C:-
1. None for the applicants.
Even on the last date of hearing i.e. 11/07/2022, none
represented the applicants.
prosecution.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
Narayan Nago Pardhi & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
