Disposed
Azaruddin Nihaluddin Mirsilkar @ Raju Sharma v. the State of Maharashtra Adn Anr.
Bombay HCBA/466/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA-466-2021-compliance.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2021
Mr.Azaruddin Nihaluddin Mirsilkar @ Raju Sharma] .. Applicant
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Smt.Anamika Malhotra, APP for State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2022.
P.C.
1] Compliance report is received from the Principal Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai, which is taken on record and marked as x- for identification.
2] The said report gives details of pending POCSO cases at Dindoshi Court and position of pendency in each Court is also specifically given.
The chart reflects that 2965 cases are pending in Dindoshi Court at Mumbai. The learned Judge has also highlighted the special drive taken for dealing with the said cases.
3] By accepting the said report, no further orders are necessary.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Mr. Azaruddin Nihaluddin Mirsilkar @ Raju Sharma
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court