The High Court allowed bail for the applicant arrested under Sections 302, 307 and 329 IPC. The judge applied offences punishable under these sections of IPC
Bail allowed on furnishing P.R Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46-ba-2884-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2884 OF 2022
Yalappa K. Narute …Applicant V/s.
State of Maharashtra
...Respondent.
Mr. Vikramsingh Parmar a/w. Mr. Chirag Sonecha for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 15.12.2022.
P.C. :
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
46-ba-2884-22.doc
O R D E R
B] The applicant be released on bail in Crime No.216 of 2021 registered at Umadi Police Station, Sangli for the ofences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 329 of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.
C] Needless to mention that the observations are prima facie.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in offences under Sections 302, 307 and 329 IPC.
Whether the lack of premeditation in the assault and inconsistencies in evidence justify bail.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Yalappa K. Narute
State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
