High Court allowed bail to the applicant arrested under Section 302 IPC. The court noted the incident was not premeditated and the applicant was imprisoned for over two years, leading to release on providing a bond.
Bail allowed; release on P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties in like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-ba-153-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 153 OF 2022
Anil B. Dhaygude V/s.
State of Maharashtra
…Applicant
...Respondent.
Ms Shubhangi Parulekar for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 13.12.2022.
P.C. :
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
23-ba-153-22.doc
friends at Hotel Jay-Malhar and in the said altercation the present applicant assaulted the deceased by paver-block.
O R D E R
A] Bail Application is allowed.
B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.17 of 2020 registered at Chikhali Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad for the ofence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an accused inimprisoned for more than two years for murder should be released on bail when the incident does not appear to be premeditated.
Whether the relationship between the accused and deceased and the grounds of the altercation justify bail in a murder case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anil B. Dhaygude
State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
