Sandesh Sitaram Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application withdrawn by counsel with court permission where the judge initially expressed disinclination to entertain it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 14 BA 150-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 150 of 2021
.. Sandesh Sitaram Jadhav Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms.Swapna Kode for the applicant. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 17th OCTOBER, 2022
P.C:-
1 On expressing my disinclination to entertain the application, learned counsel for the applicant seek permission to withdraw the application. Permission is granted.
2 Application is disposed off as withdrawn.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Tilak
Sandesh Sitaram Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court