The bail application filed by Ofor Uche was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had already undergone the sentence for the imposed punishment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Darshan Patil
35 BA-1117-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1117 OF 2021
Ofor Uche ...Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Adv. Swarali Jogalekar i/b Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi for applicant. Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for State. PSI Dilip Sawant, Bandra Police Station.
CORAM: M. S. KARNIK, J
DATED: DECEMBER 8, 2022
PC:-
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application has become infructuous. It is stated that the applicant
has already undergone the sentence for which the punishment was imposed.
2. The application is allowed to be withdrawn as infructuous and
disposed of accordingly.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1 of 1
Ofor Uche
The State Of Maharashtra
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
