This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902_ARP_167_22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 167 OF 2022
PCIL HAM BKBN Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents
Ms. Madhavi Ayyappan, i/by. Talekar and Associates for the Petitioner.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2022
P.C. :
. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition on the ground that there are talks of settlement with the respondent-State. It is submitted that if the settlement talks do not workout, liberty may be reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Priya Kambli
1/1
PCIL Ham Bkn Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
