On the application of the sole applicant for arbitration, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay observed that no party was present. Finding that the applicant was not interested in prosecuting the application, the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally VIDYASURESH signed byVIDYASURESH AMINDate: AMIN 2022.06.2818:09:07 +0530
1
11.ARBAP86_2021.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 86 OF 2021
Rajesh K. Shah .. Applicant
Vs.
Across Films LLP & Ors. .. Respondents
None present.
CORAM :G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : JUNE 28, 2022.
P.C.:
None present for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is
not interested to prosecute this application. Accordingly, dismissed for
want of prosecution.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]
Rajesh K. Shah
Across Films LLP & Ors.
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court