Criminal Application sought withdrawal by the applicant after the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief. The application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26CriAppln656.2020
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.656 OF 2020
MOHAMMAD SALIM MOHAMMAD ISAK
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Deshmukh Saud A.N.
APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.D. Ghayal
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 03 OCTOBER, 2022
PER COURT:-
1.After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant
when this Court expressed disinclination to grant any relief to
the applicant, learned Advocate for applicant, on instructions,
seeks withdrawal of the application.
2. Criminal Application stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ]
SPChauhan
Mohammad Salim Mohammad Isak
The State of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court