Yalavva Raju Inchurkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
An application under Criminal Appeal Jurisdiction seeking transfer of Sessions Case No.6 of 2016 from Jaisinghpur to Solapur on grounds of witness convenience and the applicant's poverty was rejected. The concurrent interim application for action against respondents for incorrect statements was also disposed of without action.
What the court decided
44-APL-65-2020 With-IA-1207-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2020 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1207 OF 2022
Yalavva Raju Inchurkar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for applicant.Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for State.
Mr. Priyal g. Sarda, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Namdeo s Metkari, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Amit Patil, PSI, Kurndwad, Kolhapur Police Station.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 24th JUNE, 2022.
PER COURT:
- This is an application to transfer Sessions Case No.6 of 2016
pending before the Sessions Court at Jaisinghpur to the Session Court at Solapur for trial.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the pending criminal trial proceedings should be transferred from the Sessions Court at Jaisinghpur to the Session Court at Solapur based on convenience of parties and witnesses.
Whether interim action is required against respondents for making incorrect statements in their reply to the transfer application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yalavva Raju Inchurkar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court