The applicant sought leave to withdraw the criminal application after the Court expressed dis-inclination to grant relief on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1627 OF 2022
FUKRAN AASHIK ANSARI VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Kale Pratiksha Chhaburao APP for the respondent – State : Mr. S.D. Ghayal
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATE : 14 OCTOBER 2022
PC :
After hearing the arguments, when this Court expressed its
dis-inclination to grant any relief to the applicant on merits, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn.
[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
FUKRAN AASHIK ANSARI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
