Krishna S/O Navlkishor Malpani Vs Rajendra S/O Ukandrao Jawalkar

The appellant, who is the original complainant, has challenged the judgment and order, passed on 9.05.2022 by the learned 7^th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amravati, whereby the respondent came to be acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.

¶11

The learned Advocate for the appellant submits that the appellant has good case on merit. The learned Advocate submits that the evidence adduced by the appellant has not been properly appreciated by the learned trial Judge. The learned Advocate submits that therefore leave to file appeal against Judgment and order may be granted.

¶12

In view of the facts and circumstances placed on record, leave to file appeal against the impugned Judgment and order is granted. Appeal be registered.

¶13

20.appa.636.22.odt

¶14

2

¶15

C RIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2022

¶16

The learned Advocate for the appellant submits that two weeks’ time may be granted to remove office objections. Time, as prayed for, is granted.

¶17

In case the office objections are not removed within two weeks, the appeal shall stands dismissed without reference to the Court.

¶18

If the office objections are removed within two weeks, issue notice to the respondent, returnable within four weeks thereafter.

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

Namrata

¶21

Signed By:NAMRATA YOGESH DHARKAR P. A. High Court Nagpur Signing Date:06.09.2022 18:04

Krishna S/O Navlkishor Malpani v. Rajendra S/O Ukandrao Jawalkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna S/O Navlkishor Malpani v. Rajendra S/O Ukandrao Jawalkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilesh Purushottam Bamnote Vs the State of Mah., Thr. Pso Mangrul Dastagir Tq Dhamangaon Railway Dist Amravati

Rajeshwar @Kailash Ramdas Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Khamgaon Distt. Buldhana

Sudam Ghanshyam Amrute Vs State of Mah., and Others

Sushil @ Pintu Rajendra Wankhede Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. District Government Pleader, Amravati, Dist. Amravati Pso Badnera

Motiram S/O Shiva Pawar and 3 Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Ps Pusad City

Govind S/O Shalikram Barsagade Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Chandrapur