The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant to withdraw Criminal Application No. 78 of 2022. The court disposed of the matter and directed the trial court not to consider the withdrawal as adverse.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; disposed of; trial court directed not to treat withdrawal as adverse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-APL-78-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2022
Raviraj Dinkar Sarvade ...Applicant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
….
Mr. Viresh Purwant a/w Mr. Rushikesh Kale, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 22nd JUNE, 2022.
PER COURT:
1. Heard both sides. The Court was not inclined to grant relief. Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the application.
2. In view of the submission, the application is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of. The trial Court shall not
consider the withdrawal as adverse against the applicant and shall
deal with proceedings in accordance with law.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR LIYAKAT Date: Sajakali Jamadar JAMADAR 2022.06.23 10:53:26 +0530
1 of 1
Raviraj Dinkar Sarvade
State Of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court