In this criminal application, the applicant's counsel submitted that the underlying matter was settled between parties and sought withdrawal. Consequently, the High Court at Nagpur disposed of the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.apl.235.22
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application [APL] No.235 of 2022
(Himanshu s/o Mahesh Shukla vs. Mrs. Gayatri w/o Himanshu Shukla)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Mr. Hariom Dhage h/f Mrs. Padma Chandekar, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI, J. DATE : 4 th OCTOBER, 2022.
The applicant’s learned Counsel Mr. Hariom Dhage, holding for learned Counsel Mrs. Padma Chandekar for the applicant, has submitted that the matter is settled out of the Court in between the parties and, therefore, he seeks for withdrawal.
02] The application stands disposed of since withdrawn.
JUDGE
*sandesh
Signed by:SANDESH DAULATRAO WAGHMARE Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge Signing Date:04.10.2022 17:53
Himanshu s/o Mahesh Shukla
Mrs. Gayatri w/o Himanshu Shukla
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
