In a default appeal arising from a Civil Appeal and a City Civil Court order regarding a Section 351 execution notice, the Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's non-appearance.
None; the appeal was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(26)-AO-465-2019 aw CAA-531-2019.doc
16.02.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally
signed by
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD NAJEEB
NAJEEB MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD QAYYUM
QAYYUM Date:
2022.02.16
18:30:56
+0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Appeal from Order No. 465 / 2019 Alongwith
Civil Application (CAA) No. 531 / 2019 in
Appeal from Order No. 465 / 2019
Mrs. Mariam Rashid Khan … Appellant
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. … Respondents
None for the Appellant.
Mr. Ravindra Sirsikar, Advocate for MCGM.
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2022.
P.C.
2018, declined to stay execution of notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act.
1/2
Najeeb
(26)-AO-465-2019 aw CAA-531-2019.doc
16.02.2022
3. Appeal is dismissed in default.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
2/2
Najeeb
Mrs. Mariam Rashid Khan
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
