Harvinder Singh Vijan and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge accepted bogus grounds for non-cooperation during investigation, vacated interim relief in anticipatory bail application, and rejected the plea against a serious fraud charge under IPC.
What did the court decide?
Interim protection and anticipatory bail application rejected and vacated. Interim application disposed off.
What the court decided
1/5 2 ABA-584-20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.584 OF 2020
Harvinder Singh Vijan & Anr.
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1421 OF 2020
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.584 OF 2020
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim protection granted to the applicants should be continued given their repeated failure to appear for fresh FSL investigation.
Whether the allegations of forgery and fabrication of documents warrant custodial interrogation despite the ongoing bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harvinder Singh Vijan and Anr.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Bharati Dangre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court