Applicant filed an anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw the application regarding accused No.2, and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the application regarding accused No.2; application disposed off as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)ABA-487-2020.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2020
Tushar Shahji Chaudhary ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondent
Mr.S.N. Gawade for the Applicant.
Mrs.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2022.
P.C.
1] The learned counsel for the Applicants states that the Accused No.1 on being arrested was released on bail and hence the present Applicant against him has been rendered infructuous. As far as accused No.2 is concerned, the learned counsel for the Applicants seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission is granted.
2] Application is disposed off as withdrawn.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Tushar Shahji Chaudhary
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
