Allowed

Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari C/O Mohd Sahid Ansari) and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Mar 2022ABA/407/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicants apprehending arrest in a case involving the collapse of an unauthorized building. The court held them entitled to protection pending investigation provided they cooperate, imposing conditions on inducement and periodic reporting.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail on execution of personal bond of Rs.25,000 each with sureties; imposed conditions to refrain from tampering with evidence and to report to the police station periodically.

Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari C/O Mohd… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

Digitally signed by JAYARAJAN JAYARAJAN ANJAKULATH ANJAKULATH NAIR NAIR Date: 2022.03.0418:44:43 +0530

¶2

1/4 08 ABA-407.22.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.407 OF 2022

¶4

Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari C/o. Mohd Sahid Ansari) & Anr.

¶5

.. Applicants

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra ..

¶8

Respondent

¶9

Mr. Sudeep Pasbola i/b Mr. O.P. Dubey for the applicants.

¶10

Ms. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Mr. Sawant, PSI attached to Nirmal Nagar Police Station is present, in the court.

¶12

CORAM: SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

¶13

DATED : 01^ST MARCH, 2022.

¶14

P.C:-

¶15

The applicants are apprehending their arrest in C.R. No.30 of 2022 registered with Nirmal Nagar Police Station under Sections 308, 336, 337, 338, 427 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

¶16

The said C.R. is filed on a complaint filed by the police

¶17

AJN

¶18

2/4 08 ABA-407.22.odt

¶19

inspector, Nirmal Nagar Police Station on 26/01/2022. While, he was on patrolling duty, he received the information about a building being collapsed in Behram Nagar, Bandra (E), Mumbai. He reached the spot. He noticed rubble all around and frantic cries of people in and around the building. Suspecting that some people are caught under the debris, necessary steps were taken by calling the fire brigade and the ambulance. The people, who were caught in the rubble, were removed and given medical assistance. The building which had collapsed was standing on Room No.533, Noor Ki Chawl, Behram Nagar, Bandra (East), Mumbai and, when it collapsed, it also affected Room No.527, 534, 535, which are adjoining to room No.533. The complaint further states that applicant No.1 is the owner of Room No.533, of which repairs were being carried out by applicant No.2 and this structure in the form of ground floor and five storeys, constructed on room No.533 is found to be unauthorised i.e. without any sanction plan from the planning authority or any architect certificate. The unauthorized structure has resulted into its collapse, which caused injuries to the residents in the locality is the accusation faced by the applicants.

¶20

Heard learned counsel Mr. Pasbola for the applicants and Ms. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶21

On perusal of the FIR, it can be seen that applicant No.1 is the owner of Room No.533, which had collapsed. The allegation

¶22

AJN

¶23

3/4 08 ABA-407.22.odt

¶24

is that the building was illegal and unauthorized and some repair work was being undertaken and, since the structure therein is old, it has collapsed. Fortunately, there was no loss of any life and the injuries sustained by the injured are simple injuries. Though an offence under Section 308 is prima facie held to be attracted and invoked by registering this C.R., apart from Section 336, 337, 338 and 427 read with Section 34 of the IPC, subject to the stipulation that the applicants shall render their cooperation to the Investigating Officer in completing the investigation, the applicants are held entitled for protection, in the event of their arrest.

¶25

ORDER

¶26

(a) In the event of arrest, the applicants – Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari c/o. Mohd. Sahid Ansari) and Akhlaque Mushtaque Bhati (Akhlaque Mushtaque Bhati s/o. Mushtak Chauhan) , shall be released on bail in C.R. No.30 of 2022 registered with Nirmal Nagar Police Station, District Mumbai on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000/each and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount.

¶27

AJN

¶28

4/4 08 ABA-407.22.odt

¶29

(b) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence.

¶30

(c) The applicants shall report to the Nirmal Nagar Police Station, Dist. Mumbai on Tuesdays and Thursday for two weeks between 10.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶31

The bail application is allowed in the aforestated terms.

¶32

All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the advocate under his seal and signature.

¶33

[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

¶34

AJN

Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari C/O Mohd Sahid Ansari) and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Asim Mohd. Sahid Ansari (Mohd. Asim Ansari C/O Mohd Sahid Ansari) and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Irfan Sharif Maldar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sandeep K. Varma and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Sarang Wadhawan Vs the Directorate of Enforcement through Assistatnt Director and Nar

Ajeet Vijay Potdar Vs State of Maharashtra

Vinay Laxman Khatare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Avinash Rajaram Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra