The high court dismissed two anticipatory bail applications as withdrawn. However, the bench directed police supervision of the investigation and fortnightly progress reports due to lack of progress.
Applications dismissed as withdrawn; police investigation supervised with fortnightly reporting mandated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13 ABA-2468-22.doc
BDP-SPS-TAC
BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT
Digitally signed by BHARATDASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2022.09.21 12:36:00 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2468 OF 2022
Jaykumar Motilal Doshi ….. Applicant.
V/s
State of Maharashtra ….. Respondent.
ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2470 OF 2022
Umesh Baban Palange ….. Applicant. V/s
State of Maharashtra ….. Respondent.
Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Applicant in both the above Applications. Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Gopal Ganpat Gholave HC/1701, Natepute Police Station, present.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2022
P.C.:-
1] On instructions, Mr. Kate, Counsel for the Applicant, has made prayer for withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Applications.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
1/1
Jaykumar Motilal Doshi
Umesh Baban Palange
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
