applicant showing that he had issued notices under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to said Yogesh Gurav from time to time and he has expressed that he is not co-operating with the investigation. It was also stated that the condition was imposed while granting anticipatory bail to Yogesh Gurav that he should cooperate with the investigation, but he had not cooperated to the police station and, therefore, it was stated that if he doesn’t cooperate, steps would be taken for cancellation of his bail. It further appears that on 18.01.2022, Sub Divisional Police Officer, Dhule Sub Division, Dhule had given letter to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhule that ‘B’ summary should be sanctioned as it was transpired that the FIR was wrongly filed or due to some misunderstanding, it was filed by Sanjay Shantilal Jain. Therefore, when the said complainant himself appears to be at fault, how he could have lodged any such complaint is a question. Another fact to be noted is that while the matter was before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail by the present applicant bearing Criminal Bail Application No.57 of 2022 said Yogesh Balasaheb Gurav had given affidavit stating that he had filed application for return of property, however, adjournments were granted and, therefore, he was under some mistaken facts against the Investigating Officer. He lodged the report against the applicant in the said anger. Thus, it appears that said Sanjay
