Allowed

Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 Jun 2022ABA/1319/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed anticipatory bail to Shri. Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav in a cognizable offence case. The court noted pending civil proceedings between parties and the applicant's status as a practicing advocate, ruling custodial interrogation unnecessary. Bail granted with monetary deposit and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; Applicant directed to execute P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or more local sureties in the like amount if arrested.

Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

Rane 1/318-ABA-1319-2022.odt
 9June, 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1319 OF 2022

¶4

Shri. Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav) Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ) Respondent

¶5

Mr. V.V. Purwant i/by. Mr. Anand Patil, Advocate for
the applicant.

¶6

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for State.

¶7

ASI, R.D. Parak from Shahupuri Police Station,
Kolhapur present.

¶8

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

¶9

 DATE : THURSDAY, 9TH JUNE, 2022.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1.Heard Mr. Purwant for the applicant and Mr.
Patil, APP for State.

¶12

2.I have perused the order dated 13th May, 2022
passed by this Court. In terms of that order, the applicant
has reported to the Investigating Officer and co-operated in
the investigation. The material on record, prima-facie,

¶13

Rane

¶14

Rane 2/318-ABA-1319-2022.odt
 9June, 2022

¶15

indicates that civil proceedings are pending between the
parties and alleged offences have the genesis in the said
dispute. The applicant is a practising Advocate and has firm
roots in the Society. Thus, in consideration of the facts of the
case and the accusations, in my view, custodial interrogation
of the applicant in Crime No.341/2022 registered with
Shahupuri Police Station for the offences punishable under
Sections 454, 457, 380, 447, 341 and 506 of the Indian Penal
Code, is not required. In that view of the matter, the
application is allowed.

¶16

3. In the event of arrest of the applicant in Crime
No.341/2022 registered with Shahupuri Police Station, he shall
be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of
Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only) with one or more
local sureties in the like amount.

¶17

4. The applicant shall join the investigation as and when
called.

¶18

5. The Applicant shall furnish his residential address as
well as permanent address and contact details to the
investigating officer within a week;

¶19

Rane

¶20

Rane 3/318-ABA-1319-2022.odt
 9June, 2022

¶21

6. Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.

¶22

7. Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

¶23

8. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove

¶24

NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT

¶25

Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2022.06.09 19:02:59 +0530

¶26

be construed as expression of opinion only for the purpose of
granting bail and the same shall not in any way influence the trial
in other proceedings.

¶27

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

¶28

Rane

Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratap Balasaheb Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Rajaram Mane Vs State of Maharashtra

Shweta Keyur Modi Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Anantraj @ Satish Dhananjay Belsure Vs the State of Maharashtra

Yogesh Shankar Gosavi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijay Rajaram Yedage Vs State of Maharashtra

Aryan Madhav Bedade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.