The plaintiff sought and was granted leave to withdraw Suit No. 649 of 2013. The suit was disposed of as withdrawn, and the plaintiff was directed to obtain a refund of court-fees.
Suit disposed of as withdrawn with refund of court-fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-S649-2013.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 649 OF 2013
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.10.07 10:24:09 +0530
M/s. Sun Developers ...Plaintiff
Versus M/s. Midas Developers Pvt. Ltd. & anr. …Defendants
Ms. Gargi Bhagvat, i/b M/s. Divekar Bhagvat & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Amit Dubey, i/b Ashok Saraogi, for Defendant no.1.
Ms. Pratima Soundarlkar, a/w Amit Mehta, i/b Solicis Lex, for Defendant no.2.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 6th OCTOBER, 2022
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the suit.
2. Suit stands disposed as withdrawn.
Rule.
[ N. J. JAMADAR, J. ]
1/1
M/s. Sun Developers
M/s. Midas Developers Pvt. Ltd. & anr.
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
