The High Court of Bombay dismissed the suit for want of prosecution. The plaintiff was absent on the current date and the previous date due to lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-S2566-2010.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2566 OF 2010
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.12.06 11:27:33 +0530
...Plaintiff
Cooper Chimney Pvt. Ltd.
Versus
Specialty Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. & anr. …Defendants
None for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Shraddha Chavan, i/b Rajesh Gehani, for Defendant no.1. Mr. Tejash Dande, a/w Pratik Sabrad, for Defendant no.2.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 5th DECEMBER, 2022
PC:-
1. None present for the plaintiff.
well.
[ N. J. JAMADAR, J. ]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.
Specialty Restaurants Pvt. Ltd.
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
