The writ petition filed by the petitioner was allowed to be withdrawn and the matter was disposed of without costs.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-wp 9677-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9677 OF 2018
Sathe and Company Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.Mandar Soman for Petitioner. Smt.R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for State/Respondent No.1. Mr.Joel John Carlos for Respondent No.5.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- FEBRUARY 11, 2021.
PC :
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PrajaktaS. Prajakta S.VartakDate: Vartak 2021.02.11 15:32:27 +0530
1/1
Prajakta Vartak
Sathe and Company Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court