Petitioner sought withdrawal of her writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-wp 9485-19.doc
Prajakta Vartak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9485 OF 2019
Mr.Shivdarshan Dube s/o Satyanarayan Dube ..Petitioner versus The Assistant Commissioner/ Ward OfÏcer & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.J.A. Udaipuri with Mr.J.R. Kshirsagar i/b.Udaipuri & Co. for Petitioner.
Mr.Santosh Parad for Respondent/MCGM. Mr.Milind More for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.M. Kulkarni for Respondent No.4.
CORAM :- SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE :- MARCH 23, 2021.
PC :
In view of the instructions and the praecipe, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner in person is present in the Court. Learned counsel for the respondents have no particular objection. Leave granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH)
PrajaktaS.Vartak Digitallysigned byPrajakta S.VartakDate:2021.03.2318:35:55+0530
1/1
Prajakta Vartak
The Assistant Commissioner/ Ward Officer & Ors.
Sunil P. Deshmukh
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court