Petitioner sought leave to withdraw his writ petition. Leave was granted, and the petition dismissed. The court directed the Sessions Judge to expedite the pending trial of a related Sessions Case within one year.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; prayer to expedite trial of Sessions Case No. 248 of 2020 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 929 OF 2020
Amir Yashvant Rane
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/by Mr. N. V. Kulkarni - Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Ms. Vilasini Balasubramanian a/w Mr. Priyank Daga - Advocate for
the Respondent No. 2.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik – APP -State.
CORAM :S. S. SHINDE &
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE :SEPTEMBER 02, 2021
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave
to withdraw the petition.
3. Leave is granted.
4. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the trial
in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned
Sessions Judge at Dindoshi may be expedited.
1/2
Seema
6. In the circumstances of the case the prayer to expedite the trial seems reasonable.
7. Learned Sessions Judge is requested to make an endevour to decide Sessions Case No. 248 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order.
2/2
Seema
Amir Yashvant Rane
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. Shinde
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court