Designated writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner after executing a settlement agreement with the respondent union, resulting in the disposal of the petition.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; workmen permitted to withdraw court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(22) WP 918 2019
Aura
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Writ Petition No. 918 2019 CIDADE DE GOA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, SAINATH PETITIONERS SHETTY.,
Versus
WORKMEN, REP. BY CIDADE GOA HOTEL EMPLOYEES UNION, THR. RESPONDENTS ITS SECRETARY, JOAO REGO AND ANR.,
Mr. G.K. Sardessai with Ms. S. Bangera, Advocates for the Petitioners
Mrs. E. Dias, Advocate for the Respondent no.1.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 25th October, 2021
P.C.:
1. When this petition is called out for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner handed over copy of the Consent Terms executed between the petitioner and the respondent-Union. The same is taken on record and marked “X”. In terms of the settlement, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Page 1 of 2 25th Oct..2021
(22) WP 918 2019
2. The Consent Terms also record that the workmen would be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court in the present petition, as a consequence of the settlement of the dispute.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The workmen are permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner in this Court in the present Writ Petition.
MANISH PITALE, J.
Page 2 of 2 25th Oct..2021
Cidade de Goa, Rep. by its Manager
Workmen, Rep. by Cidade Goa Hotel Employees Union
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
