Disposed

Ku. Tanvi D/O Atul Koche v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC15 Feb 2021WP/853/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of this writ petition by directing the Director, Department of Technical Education, Mumbai, to decide on the petitioner's transfer request within two weeks after receiving the institutional communication.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No. 2 to take a decision on the transfer application within two weeks from the date of the order.

Ku. Tanvi D/O Atul Koche Vs State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

wp 853.2021.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No. 853/2021

¶5

Ku. Tanvi D/o Atul Koche

¶6

…Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

Shri A.B. Moon, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. K. R. Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 - State

¶11

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶12

DATED : 15 FEBRUARY 2021

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶15

2 In view of the directions that is proposed to be issued, notice to other Respondents is not necessary.

¶16

The Petitioner is a student of Bachelor of Architecture. She has secured admission through CAP round with the Respondent No. 6 – Kamla Raheja Vidya Nidhi Institution for Architecture and Environmental Studies, Mumbai. The Petitioner is currently studying on provisional admission in Second Year (3^rd Semester) with the Respondent No.7 - Institution of Design Education and Agricultural Studies, Nagpur.

¶17

SMGate

¶18

2 wp 853.2021.odt

¶19

The Petitioner was desirous of transfer to the Respondent No. 7 – Institute of Design Education and Architectural Studies, Nagpur. The transfer of students during the course is governed by Circular dated 27 July 2020 issued by the Respondent No. 2 – the Director, Department of Technical Education, Mumbai.

¶20

On 18 August 2020, when the Petitioner had applied for transfer through the College where the Petitioner was studying earlier, the request of the Petitioner was declined on the ground that requisite document, namely, Eligibility Certificate to be issued by the University was not available with the Petitioner.

¶21

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner now has the Eligibility Certificate and all the requisite documents as per aforesaid Circular which have been submitted to the Petitioner’s College i.e. the Respondent No. 7 and the said Institution has also made a request to the Respondent No. 2- the Director, Department of Technical Education, Mumbai requesting for transfer of the Petitioner.

¶22

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner draws our attention to the said communication wherein the fact that the Petitioner’s Application was not considered earlier for lack of document and that all the documents are now available with the Petitioner is stated in the Application.

¶23

In view of this factual background and ensuing examination of the Petitioner, it would be appropriate that the Respondent No. 2- the Director, Department of Technical Education, Mumbai to take a decision

¶24

SMGate

¶25

3 wp 853.2021.odt

¶26

upon communication dated 17 December 2020 made by the Respondent No. 7 – Institute of Design Education and Architectural Studies, Nagpur within a period of two weeks from the date of the order reaches to it and communicate the same to the Institution.

¶27

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in above terms.

¶28

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶29

SMGate

Ku. Tanvi D/O Atul Koche v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Tanvi D/O Atul Koche v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii Vs M/S Corporate Ispat Alloys

Ramdas S/O Pandurang Jarate Vs State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Maha., Mumbai and Others

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur Vs Mr. Anju Saraf

Prathamesh S/O Ravindra Sonone Vs General Manager Central Railway, Mumbai and Others

Vaibhav S/O Shankar Durge Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Health, Mumbai and Others

Dattatraya Ukanda More Vs the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and Others