The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 835/2012 because the petitioner opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. Remaining writ petitions were stood over.
Writ Petition No. 835/2012 dismissed; remaining petitions stood over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
224-WP-2849-08.doc
1 / 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2849 OF 2008
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle-35
...Petitioner
vs.
M/s. Marico Industries Ltd. and Anr....Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.745 OF 2009
Marico Ltd.
...Petitioner
vs.
Director of Income Tax (INV.) Unit-VI and Ors.
...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1262 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1257 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1383 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1326 OF 2013
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2434 OF 2011
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2433 OF 2011
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.946 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.737 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.835 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax
...Petitioner
vs.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Ors....Respondents
224-WP-2849-08.doc
2 / 3
rsk
Mr. P. C. Chhotaray for the Petitioner in WP Nos.2849/2008, 1262/2012,
1257/2012, 1383/2012, 2434/2011, 2433/2011, 946/2012 and 737/2012
and 835/2012.
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Petitioner in WP No.1326/2013.
Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Atul K. Jasani and Mr. Ashok
Boghani i/b Mr. Ashok Boghani & Co. for the Petitioner in WP 745/2009
and for Respondent No.1. in WP 2849/2008 and for Respondent No.2 in
WP 835/2012.
Mr. K. Gopal a/w. Mr. Jitendra Singh and Mr. Om Kandalkar for Respondent
No.2 in WP 1262/2012, 1326/2013, 2434/2011 and 2433/2011.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 16 DECEMBER 2021.
P. C. :
WRIT PETITION NO.835 OF 2012
This petition is not part of the group and has wrongly been
tagged together.
2.On 11/3/2021 the following order came to be passed:
" Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Jasani, learned counsel submits that respondentsrsk
224-WP-2849-08.doc
3 / 3
have opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas
Act, 2020. Therefore, writ petition is required to be withdrawn.
3.Since the petition has been filed by the revenue, Mr.
Walve, learned standing counsel to obtain instructions regarding
withdrawal of the appeal.
4.Stand over to 1st April, 2021."
3.On 1/4/2021 the petition was stood over to 21/4/2021.
Thereafter the matter got listed today.
4.Mr. Chhotaray states that he has no instructions. We have
considered the document filed by Mr. Jasani to substantiate his statement
recorded in the order dated 11/3/2021. In view thereof, Writ Petition
No.835/2012 dismissed.
WRIT PETITION NOS.2849 OF 2008, 745 OF 2009, 1262 OF 2012, 1257
OF 2012, 1383 OF 2012, 1326 OF 2013, 2434 OF 2011, 2433 OF 2011,
946 OF 2012 AND 737 OF 2012
Remaining petitions be stood over to 13/1/2022.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARISUBODH RAJESHWARISUBODHKARVE KARVE Date: 2021.12.18 11:02:01 +0530
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Marico Industries Ltd.
Marico Ltd.
Director of Income Tax (INV.)
The Commissioner of Income Tax
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
K. R. Shriram
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court