Single judge dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner claiming a MACP case was pending, as the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had disposed of the underlying matter in 2019, rendering the petition infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P.H. Jayani 09 WP8238.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8238 OF 2017
Sajid Mubarak Metkari ….Petitioner
v/s.
Vanita Bhimrao Jadhav and ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Kadam for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: MADHAV JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 11th MARCH, 2021.
P. C. :-
. Mr. Abhijit Kadam, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned counsel appearing for RespondentNos.1 to 3 state that MACP No.624/2010 filed before the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara has been disposed of by Judgment
and Award dated 04/04/2019 and therefore, the Petition has become
infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Preeti H. Jayani
Digitally signed by Preeti H. Jayani Date: 2021.03.15 11:11:21 +0530
(MADHAV JAMDAR, J.)
1/1
Sajid Mubarak Metkari
Vanita Bhimrao Jadhav
Madhav Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court