Two civil writ petitions stayed for settlement talks were brought up for hearing. Since settlement negotiations failed, a party requested a proper reply reply tender. The court adjourned the matter to a future date.
Stand over to 6th March 2025 to file reply and for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dtg 32-Wp-3045-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3045 OF 2023
Ravindra Dhanaji Sogam & Anr.
… Petitioners
V/s.
Tushar Arun Bhabar
The Chief Executive Officer & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7960 OF 2021
Ravindra Dhanaji Sogam & Anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
Anant Dhanaji Sogam & Ors. … Respondents
Adv. Ajit J. Kenjale a/w Adv. Sohil M. Gulabani, Adv. Kaustubh K. Kandpile and Adv. Sai R. Kadam for Petitioners.
Adv. A.I. Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w Adv. Tanu N. Bhatia, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3-State.
Adv. Dileep Satale for Respondent No.4 in WP/3045/2023 and Respondent No.1 in WP/7960/2021.
_______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATE : 20th February 2025.
P.C. :
WP No. 3045 of 2023 and Respondent No.1 in WP No. 7960 of 2021,
submitted that, the talks of settlement between the parties could not be
fructified and both the Petitions may be heard on merits.
( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. )
( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitions should be heard on merits after failed settlement talks.
Ravindra Dhanaji Sogam & Anr.
Tushar Arun Bhabar
The Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
Anant Dhanaji Sogam & Ors.
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
