Disposed

Sebastian Joseph Sequeira v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Mar 2021WP/792/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a criminal writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to raise grievances before the trial court by filing an appropriate application, noting that observations were made without prejudice to respondents' rights.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to raise grievances before the trial court.

Sebastian Joseph Sequeira Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Laxmikant Digitally signed by Laxmikant G. G. Chandan Chandan Date: 2021.03.0510:39:53 +0530

¶2

(30) cri.wp-792.21.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.792 OF 2021

¶5

Sebastian Joseph Sequeira: Petitioner.

¶6

Versus

¶7

Stte of Maharashtra and ors.: Respondents.

¶8

Mr. Rajendra V Kamble for the Petitioner.
Smt. A S Pai, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶9

CORAM :S. S. SHINDE,

¶10

MANISH PITALE, JJ
DATE :04th MARCH 2021

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner informed this
Court that the charge is already framed by the trial court. From the perusal of
the pleadings and grounds taken in the petition and reliefs claimed therein, we
find that all these grievances can be raised before the learned Judge of the trial
court who is seized with the matter.

¶13

2At this stage the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on
instructions seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to raise the
grievances before the trial court.

¶14

2We dispose of this writ petition as withdrawn with the following

¶15

observations :-

¶16

1 of 2

¶17

lgc

¶18

(30) cri.wp-792.21.odt

¶19

(A)Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to raise the grievances

¶20

before the concerned trial court by way of filing appropriate
application/proceeding.

¶21

(B)In case such application/proceeding is filed by the Petitioner,
the concerned trial Court to consider the said application/proceeding at the
appropriate stage and pass the appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶22

(C)We made the aforesaid observations without prejudice to the

¶23

contentions of the Respondents and their right to contest the said
application/proceeding.

¶24

[MANISH PITALE, J][S. S. SHINDE , J]

¶25

2 of 2

¶26

lgc

Sebastian Joseph Sequeira v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sebastian Joseph Sequeira v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahab Riyazul Hasan Sayed and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shahab Riyazul Hasan Sayed and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Prabhakar @ Bablu Ashok Polkam Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Amish Indrajit Shah and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Viran Pratap Lilakar and Ors. Vs Dikshita Viran Lilakar and Ors.

Manan Mukesh Doshi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.