Disposed

Radha Vishvanath Bhegade v. the Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC21 Dec 2021WP/7783/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court allowed writ petitions regarding the status of regularization applications. It ordered petitioners to re-file applications in proper format within two weeks. Upon compliance, the respondent corporation must decide within six weeks, with no coercive steps against petitioners during this period.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to file corrected regularization applications within two weeks; Respondent to decide within six weeks.

Radha Vishvanath Bhegade Vs the Pune Municipal… — RTI and Transparency | Bombay HC (2021)

Y.S.Patil

17-wp-7610-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 7610 OF 2021

¶6

Nitin Jaising Kamble and Anr. .. Petitioners

¶7

V/s

¶8

Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. .. Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 7785 OF 2021

¶11

Praveen Mehaboobsab Shaikh .. Petitioners

¶12

V/s

¶13

Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. .. Respondents

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO. 7786 OF 2021

¶16

Govind Ogadram Chaudhari .. Petitioner

¶17

V/s

¶18

Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. .. Respondents

¶19

WITH

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO. 7784 OF 2021

¶21

Hitesh Kesaram Chaudhari .. Petitioner

¶22

V/s

¶23

Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. .. Respondents WITH

¶24

WRIT PETITION NO. 7783 OF 2021

Y.S.Patil

17-wp-7610-2021.doc

Radha Vishvanath Bhegade

¶29

.. Petitioner

¶30

V/s

¶31

Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors.

¶32

.. Respondents

¶33

***********

¶34

Mr. R P. Kadam, for the Petitioner in WP No. 7610 / 2021.

¶35

Dr. Uday Warunjikar a/w Akshay Deshmukh for the Petitioner in WP No. 7785/2021, WP No.7786/2021, WP No. 7784/2021 and WP No. 7783/2021.

¶36

Mr.Vishwanat Patil a/w Kewal A. a/w Ankit Lodha, for the Respondent No.1-PMC in WP No. 7610/2021

¶37

Mr. R.M. Pethe, for Respondent in WP No. 7784/2021 & WP No. 7786/2021.

¶38

Mr. R.S. Khadapkar, for Respondent in WP No. 7783/2021 & WP No. 7785/2021.

¶39

¶40

CORAM: A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶41

DATE : 21^st DECEMBER, 2021.

¶42

P.C. :-

¶43

Inasmuch as the Regularization Applications of the Petitioners are not in proper format and in accordance with law, learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that such Regularisation Applications shall be filed by each of the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.

¶44

If such Regularization Applications are filed by the

Y.S.Patil

17-wp-7610-2021.doc

Petitioners within two weeks from today, the RespondentCorporation shall decide the same expeditiously and in any event within six weeks from the date of filing of the Regularization Applications. Until the Regularization Applications are decided, no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioners. We make it clear that in the event, any of the Petitioners fail to file Regularization Application, the Respondent-Corporation shall be free to proceed against such Petitioners.

¶49

3. The Petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶50

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)

Radha Vishvanath Bhegade v. the Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radha Vishvanath Bhegade v. the Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithanagar Kaveri Chsl Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 5 Ors.

Mr. Shirish Bhaskar Sathaye Vs the Nashik Municipal Corporation through Its Municipal Commissioner and Anr.

F.N.Social, Educational Medical Charities Trust through Its Trustees Lazarus S. Chinnappa and Anr. Vs Pune Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Anr.

Nilkanth Baban Kanade and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Abhubakhar Mohammad Shaikh Vs the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation

Nitin Jaising Kamble and Anr. Vs Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr.