The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions to expedite a criminal revision application pending before the Sessions Court, finding the petitioner failed to establish merit for such expedition.
No direction to expedite the application was granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
16cri.wp679.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 679 OF 2021 (Ranjana Mukunda Gedam Vs. State of Mah. and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Shri A.P. Meshram, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri S.S. Doifode, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/State.
CORAM:V.M. DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED :- SEPTEMBER 24, 2021
By this writ petition under Articles 226 and
227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking
direction to expedite Criminal Revision No.21/2021
pending before the Sessions Court, Nagpur.
The ground for expediting the revision as
stated in the application is to the effect that the
investigation carried out by the investigation agency is not
proper.
We are of the view that on this ground, the
revision cannot be directed to be decided expeditiously.
The petitioner is not able to make out ground
to expedite the revision application which is of the year
2021. There is no merit in the petition, the petition is
dismissed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*DB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the Sessions Court to decide a criminal revision application expeditiously based solely on the ground that the investigation was not proper.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjana Mukunda Gedam
State of Mah.
V.M. Deshpande
Amit B. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court