The High Court held that a writ petition seeking transfer, filed before the Divisional Commissioner commenced proceedings, could not be entertained. The petition was henceforth disposed of.
The petition was not entertained and was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
924-wp-6457-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
924 WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2020
BELDAR SHAIKH FAHEEM SHAIKH ISMAIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Saud N Deshmukh AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 8 : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. M.S. Sonawane Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 & 6 : Mr. A.G. Talhar, ASGI Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Mr. V.H. Pawar h/f Mr. S.S. Tope
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & S.G. MEHARE, J.J.
DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:-
1/2
924-wp-6457-2020.odt
disposed of.
(S.G. MEHARE. J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Mujaheed//
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition filed without waiting for the Divisional Commissioner to commence proceedings?
BELDAR SHAIKH FAHEEM SHAIKH ISMAIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
