Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioners after they indicated they would avail statutory remedies via the Arbitrator.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; claims before Arbitrator kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
927wp6339o20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6339 OF 2020
SHAIKH AFJAL SHAIKH BHUDHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD AND TRANSPORT AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Patil Raghuvirsingh M. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri S.K. Tambe
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
&
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE :- 24th June, 2021
P er Court : -
after this Court expressed it’s disinclination to entertain this petition in the light of the statutory efficacious remedy available, the learned advocate for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that the petitioners would withdraw this petition and avail of the remedy as is permissible in law. He further submits that these petitioners have already availed of the remedy by approaching the Arbitrator.
2
927wp6339o20
agitated before the Arbitrator are kept open since we have not entertained
this petition on merits.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
Shaikh Afjal Shaikh Bhudhan and Others
The Secretary, Ministry of Road and Transport and Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
