Petitioner submitted that the Sub Divisional Officer passed an order during the petition's pendency. The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp549421.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5494 OF 2021
Yusuf Shah Nimud Shah Fakir & others
Petitioners
Versus
Ld. Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik and others
Respondents
Mr.D.S.Bagul, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.A.A.Jagatkar, AGP for Respondents.
CORAM : V.K.JADHAV, J.
DATE : 07th June, 2021.
PC :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during
the pendency of this petition, the Sub Divisional Offcer has passed the order and as such nothing survives in this petition.
In view of the above submission, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE
adb
Yusuf Shah Nimud Shah Fakir & others
Ld. Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik and others
V.K.JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
