High Court Bench at Aurangabad granted leave to withdraw a writ petition when respondent nominees withdrew their nomination. Petitioner granted liberty to raise grievance in appropriate proceeding.
Leave to withdraw writ petition granted with liberty to raise grievance in appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903WP52.21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 52 OF 2021
SURESH KARBHANI GOTE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. D.P. Palodkar.
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar.
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 & 5 : Mr. A.B. Kadethankar.
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 : Mr. R.V. Gore.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 04.01.2021
PER COURT :
Mr. Gore who appears for the respondent Nos. 6 and 7, on
instructions, submits that the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 have
withdrawn their nomination.
2. Learned Advocate Mr. Palodkar, on the basis of such statement by Mr. Gore, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to the petitioner to raise the grievance in an appropriate proceeding.
3. Leave is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
SURESH KARBHANI GOTE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court