This single-judge bench directed the respondent to decide on the petitioner's pending application for review of her suspension within three months and disposed of the writ petition without costs.
Direction to the respondent to decide on the application for review of suspension within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 4974.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4974 OF 2021
Ishratbegum Nizamoddin Sayed .. Petitioner Versus The Chief Executive Officer .. Respondent
Shri Ganesh J. Kore, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Respondent is served.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 20TH APRIL, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. Though the respondent is served, none appears for the respondent.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/April 21
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent shall decide on the petitioner's review of her suspension application within three months.
Whether the writ petition ought to be disposed of following the direction given.
Ishratbegum Nizamoddin Sayed
The Chief Executive Officer
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
