Dismissed

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Sept 2021WP/4932/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court initially directed a medical board to assess the petitioner's pregnancy. Upon receiving a report indicating severe, non-correctable fetal anomalies, the Court granted liberty for the petitioner to undergo medical termination. The subsequent report confirmed the procedure was successfully completed and no substantive issue remains.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to undergo medical termination of pregnancy until the medical board opined; subsequently disposed of upon confirmation of successful termination.

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra — Medical Negligence | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

3.WP.4932.2021.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4932 OF 2021

¶4

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav … Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

Ms. Rachita A. Padwal for the Petitioner. Mr. S. L. Babar, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶8

CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN AND

¶9

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 17^th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

¶11

P. C:-

¶12

Heard Ms. Rachita Padwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. L. Babar, learned AGP for the respondent-State.

¶13

On 1^st September, 2021 we had passed the following order:-

¶14

“2. Petitioner seeks medical termination of her pregnancy on the ground that the fetus suffers from severe anomalies. It is mentioned that presently the pregnancy is in its 20th week. 3. Having regard to the above, we direct the Dean/Civil Surgeon of Civil Hospital, Satara to constitute a Medical Board for examination of the Petitioner. Petitioner shall report before the Medical Board within 48 hours.

¶15

Let report of Medical Board be placed before this Court in sealed cover before the next date.

¶16

Stand over to 7th September, 2021.”

¶17

Thereafter, the following order was passed on 7^th September, 2021:-

¶18

“3. Today when the matter is called upon, learned AGP has

¶19

Sonali

¶20

2/2 3.WP.4932.2021.doc

¶21

placed before us report of the medical board dated 3^rd September, 2021 which we have perused. Medical board has opined that ultrasound findings of the petitioner are suggestive of congenital heart disease which are not correctable and prognosis for the fetus. Therefore, has very medical board poor has recommended medical termination of pregnancy of the petitioner.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record including report of the medical board, we grant liberty to the petitioner to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy in a hospital of her choice having adequate facilities.

¶23

Outcome of the procedure shall be informed to us by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the next date. 6. Stand over to 17^th September, 2021.”

¶24

Today when the matter is called upon, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that medical termination of pregnancy of the petitioner was successfully carried out in the Civil Hospital at Satara whereafter she has been discharged from the hospital.

¶25

In view of above, nothing survives in this Writ Petition which is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)

¶27

Sonali

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Komal Rohan Bhosale and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri. Anadrao Narayan More Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Anadrao Narayan More Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Ors.

Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra

Mrs. X. Y. Z Vs the Dean of B. J. Govt. Medical College and Sasson Hospital and Ors.

Jagdish Sakharam Parbalkar Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.