The petition was disposed of due to the death of the petitioner without representation. The court granted legal representatives liberty to approach the court if aggrieved.
Petition disposed; liberty granted to legal representatives to take appropriate proceedings if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-WP 49-20.DOC
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.49 OF 2020
Buka Tukaram Shelar
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Goa & Ors.
…Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Sulekha Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: M. S. SONAK, J
DATED: 27th July 2021
P.C.
1. Ms. S. Kamat, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 points out that the sole Petitioner has expired.
2. Ms. Kamat also submits that the order impugned in this petition was questioned by way of revision petition before the Deputy Collector and such revision petition has also been dismissed.
3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of for non-prosecution particularly since there is no motion for bringing any legal representatives on record. This order will however, not preclude
Page 1 of 2 27th July 2021
11-WP 49-20.DOC
the legal representatives of the deceased Petitioner from taking out any appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned order or the order made in the revision, if they are so aggrieved and if they are so interested.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is disposed of.
M. S. SONAK, J.
TARI AMRUT NAGESH Digitally signed by TARI AMRUT NAGESH Date: 2021.07.28 10:40:50 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2 27th July 2021
Buka Tukaram Shelar
State of Goa
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
